Spergy Fan Wikis

Because they can.

 

I just found this wiki.

 

I actually like it when someone gives a response like "because why not?" when it comes to something ridiculous

 

Oh well this is on my historial now, thank you

 

There's an autism wiki that seems to be ran by autism activists from Tumblr that has an article on Chris.

 

I think if you want to make an autism wiki, it might be best to use something more... professional

 

The Captain Underpants wiki is really surreal if you aren't familiar with the source material. http://captainunderpants.wikia.com/wiki/Chim-Chim_Diaperbrains
(I think the wiki itself isn't quite as autistic as my shock that I'm four whole books behind)

 

At least something that doesn't say "fandom" on the top, makes it look like they are fans of the autism spectrum

I read this as scary goat mother. You cannot imagine my disappointment when I clicked the link

Edit (other than the merging someone did, sorry about that):
A lego wiki. Just why?

 

There is actually a Gender Wiki that has this article that seems out of place compared to the rest of the wiki.

 

There is an entire wiki about the Titanic.

 

Eh, to be fair, LEGOs have been around since the early 20th century, and a wiki could be of use to collectors.

 

Hopefully not just the James Cameron movie

 

I too will defend that one. I got out of the Lego hobby long ago, but adult fans of Lego often do things like:

• Recreate classic sets long out of production
• Collect complete sets of certain themes
  
• Build elaborate (as in both physically large and complex) projects requiring strange combinations of parts or parts in odd colors
• Build complex functional devices (robots mostly)

To do it all requires extensive categorization of sets and bricks such that if you need 4x2s in a non evergreen color (that's a Lego slang term) or you need to be very exact about which "Police Station" set you are referring to (Lego has released many police station sets), having some common schema and reference tools is necessary.

I mean it's nerdy as hell, but I wouldn't call it "Spergy" because it's actually necessary if you want to be the kind of Lego enthusiast who build stuff like this just for a quick example:

http://legoland.bubm.de/www/events/2005_allianz/Arena-Innen-mit-Rauch.jpg

 

Well, there's that, too.

 

Literally any wiki dedicated to animated equine cartoons intended to be aimed toward elementary school-aged girls and subsequently ruined by neck bearded men in their mid-late 20’s and 30’s.

 

http://animefeet.wikia.com/wiki/Animated_Feet_Scenes_Wiki
I laughed

 

There's a furry wiki but I'm too afraid to go there.

 

This wiki is actually really useful because it has information about prominent furries including our boy Hirtes. I haven't explored more than the prominent individuals section though so I can't say if its safe for work but I would assume no.

 

I don't think it's always "autistic" to make a fan wiki. If the series is complex with a lot to keep track of, a wiki could be helpful. And like I said, it can help declutter Wikipedia of multiple articles on the same series. But if it's a simple series with a simple premise (like many Western cartoons intended for children), you likely don't need a whole wiki on it.

 

https://johnnytest.fandom.com/wiki/Johnny_Test_Wiki