#blocktheTrolls

I think the point Pibot is trying to make is that Chris isn't innocent in this whole debacle. A good part of all of this is his fault for being a creeper who can't read social cues. The weens aren't innocent either, but it's not fully on them.

 

chris makes this hashtag and expects people to do his bidding. Reverse psychology will happen and Chris is in an even worse position than before

 

Oh, I agree. That in-your-face autism is what makes viewing Chris's interactions so much fun. There is no hero in the story, but I hold the weens accountable because they should (and I heavily emphasize that word) be a little more aware than Chris (not that it's a hard thing to do).

Reverse psychology always works on weens. Imagine if Chris had one moment of super-awareness in his life, told the weens that donating to (insert charitable cause name here) was stupid and that the people who ran it were dang dirty trolls, and led to that cause raising a whole shit-ton of money from weens who were simply trying to JULAAAAAAAAAAY Chris.

 

That's always been a common theme with Chris:
Whenever he demands that trolls do a certain thing, they almost always do the opposite, just to piss him off.

 

Chris knows the trolls will follow him no matter what. He's only trying to communicate with these women on Twitter for selfish reasons. He could make a new anonymous account and follow them, no trolls. His ego won't allow him to do that...plus he thinks he's going to score.

 

It goes back to that weird, chaotic, unpredictable relationship Chris has with honesty. I don't think he realizes that it's really an ego issue, he just thinks that he's defending what he believes to be honesty. The fun part about his relationship with honesty is that, while lying about nearly everything, he decides to exercise his devotion to honesty at times when nobody asked to know the full truth about something (shecameforCWC.jpg, DIRTY CRAPPED BRIEFS, etc.).

 

I wonder if there is a charity that gives lego to children in need.

 

No, Chris would have to tell the weens NOT to donate to a charity. With his devotion to brand loyalty, I doubt he could do it to something involving Legos.

 

Oh don't get me wrong, blocking Chris is 50% him and 50% clearing up your notifications of "[X] responded to Chris's response to your status/tweet" You can't blame one without the other. You want to shit on weens I'll be right there with you, because you're clearly not protesting that Chris is 100% innocent.
People want to respond to Chris, and that's fine, I've done it, there's a thread about me doing it. I'll tread carefully, because I know that the line between responding to Chris once in a while and 47 twitter handles is finer than it should be.

No truer statement has been made.

Every idiot ween wants Chris fame, they bombard his Twitter with Julays (Julaies?) and die Chris and every other non-original line in the book so Chris can lose his shit and start a tweet war, all while we worship them as the next Clyde while writing up the CWCki page praising their brilliance because, like Chris, they think Internet fame is the most important thing one can have.

 

And as I've said before, because of how Chris ALWAYS views himself as a paragon of virtue, things get interesting when he battles a villain to attain what he wants (a sweetheart, ads taken off the CWCapedia, etc). But the villain has to be as intriguing as Chris is. Clyde was intriguing. Alec was intriguing. Liquid was intriguing.

Tweeting "cris iz suck n sonichu iz suck 2 n die cris JULAAAAAAAAAAY" is not.

 

Chris really does think he's the hero of his story. he couldn't be more wrong.

I await Tara Strong inevitably blocking Chris and he does a total 180 on MLP.

 

A charity that donates pickles to the hungry then.

 

When chris starts begging for food money again...

 

An yet the Love Quest continues...

 

Chris is his own biggest troll so it makes sense to block him tbh fam.

 

Is it wrong I read this string of tweets in Sailor Moon's voice?

 

you know just how to get a laugh out of me.